Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

264 F.2d 229

Docket No. 13634.

Edick v. United States

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Feb. 14, 1959.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1959-02-14

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1959

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1959-02-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Roy Cook, Kansas City, Kan., for appellant.

¶2Fred W. Kaess, Donald F. Welday, Jr., U. S. Attys., Detroit, Mich., for appellee.

¶3Before MARTIN, Chief Judge, and MATHES and SHELBOURNE, District Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5This cause came on to be heard on the briefs and the record in the cause. Whereupon, the United States Attorney admitted that appellant had been denied assistance of counsel · Case Law">effective assistance of counsel, within the requirement of the Sixth Amendment, upon arraignment and upon the entry of a guilty plea, and it appearing that the action of the United States Attorney in this respect was in consonance with appropriate authority.

¶6The judgment of the United States District Court, in denying the motion of appellant to vacate sentence pronounced upon him, is directed to be set aside and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

/264/f2d/229 · .json · Public domain