Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

264 F.2d 247

Docket No. 13637.

Docket No. 13638.

United States Steel Corporation, of the Steamer Elbert H. Gary v. Detroit & Cleveland Navigation Company, a Michigan Corporation, Etc., Detroit & Cleveland Navigation Company, a Michigan Corporation, Etc., Cross-Appellant v. United States Steel Corporation, of the Steamer Elbert H. Gary, Cross-Appellee

Full caption · 2 consolidated cases

  • UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, Claimant of the Steamer Elbert H. Garyv.DETROIT & CLEVELAND NAVIGATION COMPANY, a Michigan corporation, etc
  • DETROIT & CLEVELAND NAVIGATION COMPANY, a Michigan corporation, etc., Cross-v.UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, Claimant of the Steamer Elbert H. Gary, Cross-

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1959-02-24

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 1984

3 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Detroit & Cleveland Navigation Co. v. Gary

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1959-02-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Detroit; Clifford O'Sullivan, Judge.

Arter, Haddon, Wykoff & Van Duzer, Cleveland, Ohio, Watson, Lott & Wunsch, Detroit, Mich., for United States Steel Corp., etc.

Foster, Meadows & Ballard, John A. Hamilton, Detroit, Mich., for Detroit & Cleveland Navigation Co., etc.

Before ALLEN and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges, and MATHES, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the briefs of the parties, the transcript of record, and the arguments of counsel in open court, and the court being fully advised, Now, Therefore, It is Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the judgment of the District Court, Detroit & Cleveland Nav. Co. v. The Elbert H. Gary, 161 F.Supp. 570, be and is hereby affirmed upon the findings of fact and conclusions of law of Judge O'Sullivan.

/264/f2d/247 · .json · Public domain