Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 264 F.2d 311 - Lietz v. Flemming

Lietz v. Flemming’s Empirical Analysis

264 F.2d 311 · 1959

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
July 2015
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently July 2015

10 federal appellate · 2 district ·

1501959196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. American Trucking Associations · United States v. Borden Co. · Posadas v. National City Bank · McLaren v. Fleischer · United States v. Burroughs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) [w]here provisions in the two acts are in irreconcilable conflict, the later act to the extent of the conflict constitutes an implied repeal of the earlier one; and (2) [i]f the later act covers the whole subject of the earlier one and is clearly intended as a substitute, it • will operate similarly as a repeal of the earlier act. But in either ease, the intention of the Legislature to repeal must be clear and manifest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.