Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 264 F.2d 40 - Horne v. United States

Horne v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

264 F.2d 40 · 1959

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
October 1992
most recently cited

37 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1992 · most notably Baldwin v. New York Williams (1970), Bayless v. United States (1967)

37 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

22019591960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 18 U.S.C. § 3

Relies on Patton v. United States · Stevenson v. Reed · Kennedy v. United States · Arthur v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ -x- * * knew that the matter was discussed and by agreement of Court and all counsel, the trial proceeded with but eleven jurors. As on the opening of the trial, he voiced no protest and made no objection.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““If there was the slightest anxiety over a trial by less than twelve, petitioner and his counsel had merely to decline the stipulation impliedly proposed in the Court’s inquiry. Had they so declined it is obvious that alternate jurors would have been impaneled * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““(b) Jury of Less Than Twelve. Juries shall be of 12 but at any time before verdict the parties may stipulate in writing with the approval of the court that the jury shall consist of any number less than 12.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.