Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 264 F.2d 515 - Fleischer v. Phillips

Fleischer v. Phillips’s Empirical Analysis

264 F.2d 515 · 1959

Citation profile

107
cited by 107 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
March 2001
most recently cited

66 federal appellate · 2 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 107 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2001 · most notably Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Risjord (1981), Emle Industries, Inc. v. Patentex, Inc. (1973)

66 federal appellate · 2 district · 7 state decisions

490195919601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1292

Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Davis v. Illinois · Morgenstern Chemical Co. v. Schering Corp. · Skirvin v. Mesta

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 107 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “seriously disrupts the progress of litigation and decisively sullies the reputation of the affected attorney,”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The real and only bite to each motion is the attempt to secure the exclusion of the lawyers from the case; and once disqualification is obtained, all else is superfluous. Hence the prayers for injunctive relief add nothing to the orders denying the motions and render neither of them automatically appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (a) (1).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “that small class which finally determine claims of right separable from, and collateral to, rights asserted in the action, too important to be denied review and too independent of the cause itself to require that appellate consideration be deferred until the whole case is adjudicated,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.