United States v. McCartney’s Empirical Analysis
264 F.2d 628 · 1959
Citation profile
25 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently February 2008 · most notably State v. Villavicencio (1964), United States v. Wilson (1978)
25 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Bender · United States v. Bucur · United States v. Wall · United States v. Lawinski · United States v. Sebo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * Evidence even of other criminal acts is admissible when so blended or connected with the crime of which defendant is accused that proof of one incidentally involves the other or explains the circumstances thereof. United States v. Wall, 7 Cir., 1955, 225 F.2d 905 ; United States v. Crowe, 7 Cir., 1951, 188 F.2d 209 .””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.