Manufacturers Casualty Insurance Company, Appellants-Appellees v. Intrusion-Prepakt, Incorporated, Appellee-Appellant. Intrusion-Prepakt, Incorporated, Appellee-Appellant v. Manufacturers Casualty Insurance Company, Appellants-Appellees’s Empirical Analysis
264 F.2d 758 · 1959
Citation profile
11 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 1987
11 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Sanders v. Leech
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Under that rule, as it plainly reads and has been interpreted by the courts, it is not for the appellate court to substitute its judgment on disputed issues of fact for that of the trial court where there is substantial credible evidence to support the finding. It may reverse, though, under the rule (1) where the findings are without substantial evidence to support them; (2) where the court misapprehended the effect of the evidence; and (3) if, though there is evidence which if credible would be substantial, the force and effect of the testimony considered as a whole convinces that the finding is so against the great preponderance of the credible testimony that it does not reflect or represent the truth and right of the case.” Sanders v. Leech, 5 Cir., 1946, 158 F.2d 486 , 487. See United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364 , 68 S.Ct. 525 , 92 L.Ed. 746 ; Williams v. United States, 5 Cir., 1958, 252 F.2d 887 ; Manufacturers Casualty Ins. Co. v. Intrusion-Prepakt, Inc., 5 Cir., 1959, 264 F.2d 758 ; Neil v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 5 Cir., 1959, 269 F.2d 563 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.