O'Neal v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
264 F.2d 809 · 1959
Citation profile
28 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2012 · most notably Lott v. United States (1961), Bobby Jones Garden Apartments, Inc. v. Suleski (1968)
28 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 1 (Airport and Airway Extension Act of 2008)
Relies on Lemke v. United States · United States v. Arizona · Blunt v. United States · Boykin v. Huff · Randolph v. Randolph
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““To extend the time for taking an appeal, a motion for new trial must be both (a) timely made under Rule 33 and (b) made within ten days after entry of the judgment of conviction under Rule 37(a) (2).” O’Neal v. United States, 5 Cir., 1959, 264 F.2d 809 , 812. Cf. Massi-cot v. United States, 5 Cir., 1958, 254 F.2d 58 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.