Rogers v. Vicuna’s Empirical Analysis
264 F.3d 1 · 2001
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Katz v. United States · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · G. M. Leasing Corp. v. United States · Smith v. Harmsen · Cosoff v. Rodman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to persons acting ‘under color of state law’ and not to persons acting pursuant to federal law.” Chatman v. Hernandez, 805 F.2d 453, 455 (1st Cir.1986). See also, Rogers v. Vicuna, 264 F.3d 1, 4 (1st Cir.2001) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.