Russell Corporation v. American Home Assurance Company Commerce and Industry Insurance Company Aetna Casualty & Surety Insurance Company Inc the’s Empirical Analysis
264 F.3d 1040 · 2001
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 7 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Singleton v. Wulff · Mansfield Ry Co v. Swan · Thermtron Products, Inc. v. Hermansdorfer · Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca · Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Martin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'strictly construe the right to remove' and apply a general 'presumption against the exercise of federal jurisdiction, such that all uncertainties as to removal jurisdiction are to be resolved in favor of remand.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he unanimity requirement mandates that in cases involving multiple defendants, all defendants must consent to removal.” Russell Corp. v. American Home Assur. Co., 264 F.3d 1040, 1044 (11th Cir.2001); see also Hernandez v. Seminole County, Fla., 334 F.3d 1233, 1237 (11th Cir.2003) (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]n order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed is not reviewable on appeal or otherwise ....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.