Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 264 F.3d 817 - Marica Ove

Marica Ove’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

107
cited by 107 later decisions
3
states following
January 2020
most recently cited

4 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 107 later decisions — most recently January 2020 · most notably Estate of Spirtos, State v. Brown (2004)

4 district · 3 state decisions

610200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Graham v. Connor · Heck v. Humphrey · Schmerber v. State of California · Arizona v. Fulminante · Tennessee v. Garner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 107 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To state a civil RICO claim, plaintiffs must allege (1) conduct (2) of an enterprise (3) through a pattern (4) of racketeering activity (5) causing injury to plaintiffs' 'business or property.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[W]hen a state prisoner seeks damages in a § 1983 suit, the district court must consider whether a judgment in favor of the plaintiff would necessarily imply the invalidity of his conviction or sentence; if it would, the complaint must be dismissed unless the plaintiff can demonstrate that the conviction or sentence has already been invalidated.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “However, plaintiffs fail to allege injury: They do not allege any financial loss to their business or property and the deprivation of”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.