Wixom v. Washington’s Empirical Analysis
264 F.3d 894 · 2001
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Christopher Artuz Superintendent Green Haven Correctional Facility v. Tony Bruce Bennett · Magnolia Venture Capital Corp. v. Mississippi Department of Economic & Community Development · Michael Allen Bowen v. Ernest Roe, Warden California State Attorney General · 121 Wash. 2d 432 - Matter of Personal Restraint of Runyan · Albert Bribiesca v. George Galaza, Warden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) A 1-year period of limitation shall apply to an application for a writ of habeas corpus by a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court. The limitation period shall run from the latest of (A) the date on which the judgment became final by the conclusion of direct review or the expiration of the time for seeking such review....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Quintero v. Tilton“A 1-year period of limitation shall apply to an application for a writ of habeas corpus by a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court. The limitation period shall run from the latest of ... the date on which the judgment became final by the conclusion of direct review or the expiration of the time for seeking such review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hemmerle v. Schriro“[U]nder [§ 2244(d)], a judgment becomes `final' in one of two wayseither by the conclusion of direct review by the highest court, including the United States Supreme Court, to review the judgment, or by the expiration of the time to seek such review, again from the highest court from which such direct review could be sought.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Quintero v. Tilton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.