¶1 Robert Crow appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendants and awarding Defendants their costs. This Court has considered the record in light of the briefs and oral argument, and we affirm. The evidence does not establish that all reasonable police officers would have found probable cause lacking under the facts of this case, and Defendants are therefore entitled to qualified immunity. Babb v. Dorman, 33 F.3d 472, 477 (5th Cir.1994). We likewise find no abuse of discretion in the award of costs to Defendants. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
264 F. App'x 421
Crow v. Pelken
U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided February 1, 2008
This page is marked noindex.
U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2008-02-01
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 2015
Relies on Babb v. Dorman
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2008-02-01
View the full empirical analysis of this case →