Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 264 FSUPP 120 - Bacon v. Holzman

Bacon v. Holzman’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
December 1992
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently December 1992

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

801967197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 28 U.S.C. § 2281 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Baker v. Carr · Monroe v. Pape · Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation · Reynolds v. Sims · Crowell v. Benson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As a result and in apparent good faith, technical grounds are often utilized to disqualify nominating petitions. For the most part such action is statutorily on impeccable ground. But from what we could tell . by a zealously restrictive reading of the statute the Board apparently makes it exceedingly difficult for a candidate to qualify his name for a place on the ballot. . . . Bacon v. Holzman, 264 F.Supp. 120, 133 (N.D.Ill.1967).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “state a claim under Sec. 1983 since they assert a deprivation of a right, which under Snowden, is derived only from their state citizenship.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.