264 F. Supp. 246 - Clauss v. Danker’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
1 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 2009
1 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kerr Ss Co v. United States · Harris v. Standard Accident & Insurance · Melville Harris, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Leonard Massello and William Massello v. Standard Accident and Insurance Company · Dumas v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. · Superior Insurance v. Superior Court
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, which is relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending ac- tion_ [Emphasis added.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“"The purpose of pre-trial discovery is to prepare for trial of the issues, not to uncover assets that might be applied toward satisfaction of a judgment."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.