264 F. Supp. 845 - Jaffe v. Dolan’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently October 1989
5 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 631 (Business Opportunity Development Reform Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 78A (§ 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 28 U.S.C. § 1404
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Hanson v. Denckla · Hoffman v. Blaski · Mississippi Pub Corporation v. Murphree · Arrowsmith v. United Press International
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In diversity actions, a federal district court can assert personal jurisdiction over a defendant only if the state court, under constitutionally valid state legislation in the state where the federal court sits, could have exercised such jurisdiction. Arrowsmith v. United Press Int’l, 320 F.2d 219 , 6 A.L.R.3d 1072 (2d Cir. 1963).””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A claim for libel or slander arises in the state where it is published.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.