Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

264 Ga. 803

Brown v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 28, 1994

Supreme Court of Georgia · decided 1994-11-28

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“[t]he State cannot concede error where there is none. [Cits.] This court must determine for itself whether error exists.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 266 Ga. App. 871 - Collins v. State

Relies on Simmons v. United States · 211 Ga. App. 647 - Shaw v. State · 205 Ga. App. 533 - Busbee v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1994-11-28

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably Thomason v. State (1997), Johnson v. State (1997)

39 state decisions

1601994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Carley, Justice,

¶1concurring specially.

¶2In my opinion, the trial court did not transgress the holding of Simmons v. United States, 390 U. S. 377 (III) (88 SC 967, 19 LE2d 1247) (1968). For this reason, I must concur specially as to Division 3 of the majority opinion.

¶3The State cannot concede error where there is none. See, e.g., Busbee v. State, 205 Ga. App. 533, 534 (423 SE2d 3) (1992); Shaw v. State, 211 Ga. App. 647, 649 (2) (440 SE2d 245) (1994). This court must determine for itself whether error exists. Simmons, supra, holds only

that when a defendant testifies in support of a motion to suppress evidence on Fourth Amendment grounds, his testimony may not thereafter be admitted against him at trial on the issue of guilt unless he makes no objection.

¶4(Emphasis supplied.) Simmons, supra at 394 (III). In the instant case, the testimony in question had been given at a Jackson v. Denno hearing, at which the issue was the admissibility of prior incriminating statements. Thus, Simmonsis inapplicable. See United States v. McClellan, 868 F2d 210, 215 (7) (7th Cir. 1989). I would hold that the only error committed by the trial court was its refusal to honor appellant’s request that the entirety of his testimony at the Jackson v. Denno hearing be admitted pursuant to OCGA § 24-3-38. I do agree with the majority that this error was not harmless and, therefore, concur in the judgment.

/264/ga/803 · .json · Public domain