Young v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
February 1980
most recently cited
34 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Turner v. State · Priola v. State · Cochran v. State · 157 Ind. App. 407 - Sacks v. State · 162 Ind. App. 280 - Ruhl v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) intends to deprive the owner of the use or benefit of the property; or (b) intends to deprive the owner of some part or all of the value, which value and ownership shall be inferred from the price tag or price marking on such merchandise or property, of any property or merchandise displayed or offered for sale by any mercantile establishment as defined by IC 1971, 35-3-2-4(c);, or (c) uses, conceals or abandons the property in such manner as knowingly to deprive the owner of such use or benefit; or (d) uses, conceals or abandons the property knowing such use, concealment or abandonment probably will deprive the owner of such use or benefit."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.