Brandon v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 90 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 93 later decisions — most recently December 2010 · most notably 174 Ind. App. 439 - Bassett v. Glock (1977), Indiana Department of State Revenue v. Caylor-Nickel Clinic, P.C. (1992)
3 federal appellate · 90 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Langley v. State · Frazier v. State · Harris v. Young Women's Christian Assn. of Terre Haute · State Ex Rel. MacOn v. Orange Circuit Court · LANE, ETC. v. Hobbs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 93 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"A fact is material if it tends to facilitate resolution of any of the issues either for or against the party having the burden of persuasion on that issue.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"To grant or deny a summary judgment, the trial court must take certain steps. Those steps may be described briefly as follows: Identify the legal issues; Identify the nature of the material facts; Identify the material facts presented by the parties; Determine whether the material facts presented are in genuine issue, and, if they are, deny summary judgment; If the material facts presented are not in genuine issue, apply the law and grant or deny summary judgment."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““ (a) no timely and adequate motion to correct error was filed for the defendant; (b) the failure to file a timely motion to correct error was not due to the fault of the defendant; and (c) the defendant has been diligent in requesting permission to file a belated motion to correct error under this rule.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Boys v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.