Sendak v. Debro’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 1996
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Board of Com'rs v. Kokomo City Plan Com'n · Board of Commissioners v. Kokomo City Plan Commission · Wheeler v. Bullington · Parr v. City of Seattle · Tobin v. Pursel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“‘decide whether the State, with the forces it can muster, should step in and support the enactment.’ ” Gardner, 320 Md. at 72 , 576 A.2d at 212 (quoting Sendak v. Debro, 264 Ind. 323, 327 , 343 N.E.2d 779, 781 (1976)). Since we have found”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“When declaratory relief is sought, all ■persons shall be made parties who have or claim any interest which would be affected by the declaration, and no declaration shall prejudice the rights of persons not parties to the proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“... if a statute or regulation is alleged to be unconstitutional, the Attorney General of the state shall also be served with a copy of the proceeding and be entitled to be heard.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.