Lund v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
65 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently April 2002 · most notably Misenheimer v. State (1978), French v. State (1977)
65 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Moore v. Illinois · Luckett v. State · Carroll v. State · Johns v. State · Hollars v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The sanctions for failure to comply with a discovery order are discretionary, not mandatory. Indiana Rules of Trial Procedure 37. There is no indication that the failure to list this witness was an act of bad faith or deliberate suppression which would warrant a discharge. Moore v. Illinois, (1972) 408 U.S. 786 , 92 S.Ct. 2562 , 33 L.Ed.2d 706 ; Evans v. Janing, (8th Cir. 1973) 489 F.2d 470 . Nor has the defendant shown that he was harmed by the judge’s ruling on this matter.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cochran v. State““No party may claim as error the giving of an instruction unless he objects thereto before the jury retires to consider its verdict, stating distinctly the matter to which he objects and the grounds of his objection.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Johnson v. Naugle
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.