Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
41 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently April 2011 · most notably Roberts v. State (1977), Kerns v. State (1976)
41 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blackburn v. State · Emerson v. State · Hoskins v. State · Davis v. State · Lottie v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . (1) that the evidence has been discovered since the trial; (2) that it is material and relevant; (3) that it is not cumulative; (4) that it is not merely impeaching; (5) that it is not privileged or incompetent; (6) that due diligence was used to discover it in time for trial; (7) that the evidence is worthy of credit; (8) that it can be produced upon a retrial of the case; and (9) that it will probably produce a different result.” Tungate v. State, (1958) 238 Ind. 48, 54-55 , 147 N.E.2d 232, 235-36 . See e. g. Clark v. State, Ind., 378 N.E.2d 850 ; Jackson v. State, (1975) 264 Ind. 54 , 339 N.E.2d 557 ; and Emerson v. State, (1972) 259 Ind. 399 , 287 N.E.2d 867 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Powers v. State · Bryant v. State“The Indiana Supreme Court has analyzed and discussed the problem of an alleged incompetent counsel: “We recognize that the ‘waiver of error’ rule is a harsh one and that post conviction claims of incompetency of counsel have mushroomed as efforts to open the door to reviews of claimed error which, on many occasions, ought to have been previously presented. We also recognize that our seine for netting the bona fide incompetence claims is course [sic] and gives a petitioner seeking a new trial upon such grounds a burden even heavier than that carried in most post conviction proceedings. . . . Assuming that the petitioner ... carries his burden of proof as to the facts alleged, the effect must, nevertheless, be judged in context on a case to case basis; and the burden is upon the petitioner not only as to the facts but also to persuade the trial court that his trial counsel’s representation was ineffective and that the ‘totality of the circumstances’ reflect incompetence and a mockery of justice. . ..” Jackson v. State (1975), 264 Ind. 54 , 339 N.E.2d 557, 559-560 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““Minimal consultation does not necessarily show incompetent or ineffective representation. (Cites omitted.) To require reversal, it must be shown that the consultation was so perfunctory that evidence capable of changing the result at trial was not presented.” Jackson v. State, (1975) 264 Ind. 54, 57 , 339 N.E.2d 557, 560 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Taylor v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.