264 Mich. App. 286 - In Re BZ’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A finding is clearly erroneous if, although there is evidence to support it, we are left with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“We review the trial court's decision to exercise jurisdiction for clear error in light of the court's findings of fact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“To properly exercise jurisdiction, the trial court must find that a statutory basis for jurisdiction exists.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.