Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

264 N.C. 168

State v. Fesperman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 1965

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1965-04-07

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1965-04-07

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently July 2025 · most notably In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 53 Peoples (1978), Lemmerman v. A. T. Williams Oil Co. (1986)

47 state decisions

2001965197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CüRiam.

¶1On authority of S. v. Hord, ante 149, we hold that a duly appointed policeman of the City of Charlotte, North Carolina, is an officer of said City within the meaning of G.S. 14-230.

¶2The ruling of the court below, quashing these bills of indictment, will be upheld for the reasons stated in the case of S. v. Stogner, filed this day, ante 163.

¶3Affirmed.

/264/nc/168 · .json · Public domain