264 N.C. App. 1 - Bezzek v. Bezzek’s Empirical Analysis
2019
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 111 N.C. App. 244 - Cagle v. Teachy · 171 N.C. App. 266 - Brown v. City of Winston-Salem · 135 N.C. App. 758 - Collins v. Talley · 232 N.C. App. 444 - Peters v. Peters · Richmond v. George
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When an appeal is interlocutory and not certified for appellate review pursuant to Rule 54(b), the appellant must include in the statement of grounds for appellate review sufficient facts and argument to support appellate review on the ground that the challenged order affects a substantial right. Otherwise, the appeal is subject to dismissal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[w]hen an appeal is interlocutory, the statement [of grounds for appellate review] must contain sufficient facts and argument to support appellate review on the ground that the challenged order affects a substantial right.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.