Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 264 Neb. 976 - State v. Haltom

State v. Haltom’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
September 2008
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hamling v. United States · Miller v. California · State v. Davlin · State v. Larsen · State v. Harris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘[I]t is the duty of the trial court, without any request to do so, to instmct the jury on the issues presented by the pleadings and supported by the evidence. . . . “ ‘In applying that principle we have established that the failure to object to instructions after they have been submitted to counsel for review or to offer more specific instructions if counsel feels the court-tendered instructions are not sufficiently specific will preclude raising an objection on appeal, unless there is a plain error indicative of a probable miscarriage of justice.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.