Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 264 NW2D 459 - Landers v. Goetz

Landers v. Goetz’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
May 2023
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently May 2023

17 state decisions

60197819801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Beacon Theaters Inc v. C Westover · Dairy Queen, Inc. v. Wood · Garrou v. Teaneck Tryon Co. · Harryman v. Hayles · CIT Corporation v. Hetland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is the general rule that legal issues entitling a party to a jury trial should be tried to the jury prior to the disposition of the equitable issues triable to the court. Whenever the issues are so interrelated that a decision in the nonjury portion might affect the decision of the jury portion, the jury portion is to be tried first, since otherwise the party entitled to the jury trial would be deprived of part or all of his right to a jury trial.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““In the State Constitution, it is the right to the essential incidents of trial by jury as it existed in the Territory of Dakota which remains inviolate. Power v. Williams, 53 N.D. 54 , 205 N.W. 9 (1925); Smith v. Kunert, 17 N.D. 120 , 115 N.W. 76 (1908). There is no real difference between the Federal constitutional right and the right under Territorial law, since the latter was the same as the right at common law and under the United States Constitution. Power v. Williams, supra.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “But when Goetz not only answered, setting forth a basis for dismissal of the complaint, but also counterclaimed, setting forth a claim for money damages, his counterclaim asked for relief which was strictly legal, as opposed to equitable, and entitled either party to demand a trial by jury as of right. Suits for damages are suits for legal relief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.