Malarchick v. Pierce’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently November 2017
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 19 Cal. 3d 691 - Board of Education v. Jack M. · In Re Estate of Elmer · Moers v. . Moers · United States Rubber Products, Inc. v. Clark · Andre Backar, Cross-Appellee v. Western States Producing Company (Now Hytech Energy Corporation) and Wayman W. Buchanan, Cross-Appellants
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"We believe, however, that testimony unfavorable to one's own contention can be a `judicial admission' if it is `deliberate, clear and unequivocal.'"”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[A] finding of fact is clearly erroneous if it is induced by an erroneous view of the law, if no evidence supports it or if, on the entire record, we are left with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Huber v. Dooher“an agreement to accept in extinction of an obligation something different from or less than that to which the person agreeing to accept is entitled.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Huber v. Dooher
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.