Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 264 NW2D 707 - State v. Carsten

State v. Carsten’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 2025

15 state decisions

70197819801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gregg v. United States · Scott v. United States · United States v. George H. Lustig, United States of America v. Gregory D. Pederson · United States v. Hendrix · Hess v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"`Prior convictions may cause a heavier sentence, though the defendant has already "paid" for them. A general course of dissolute, irresponsible, shiftless, or dangerous behavior may be deemed to call for longer incarceration though none of its components are, strictly, "crimes."'"”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““[T]o be a proper person for probation or some sort of suspended sentence, it’s necessary that I’m convinced that he’s being truthful and candid with me ...” * sj: * * * sis “The reason I’ve sentenced you to the Penitentiary instead of putting you on probation or some type of suspended imposition is that your employment history is not real good, ... and secondly, I don’t believe you’ve been honest with the Court in relation to what occurred on that particular occasion.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““may rest on hearsay and contain information bearing no relation whatever to the crime with which the defendant is charged.” Gregg v. United States, 394 U.S. 489, 492 , 89 S.Ct. 1134, 1136 , 22 L.Ed.2d 442, 446 . See also Davis v. United States, 5 Cir., 376 F.2d 535 ; Farrow v. United States, S.D.Cal., 373 F.Supp. 113 ; State v. Bevins, 198 Neb. 761 , 255 N.W.2d 284 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.