Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 264 ORAPP 71 - State v. E.D.

State v. E.D.’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The clear and convincing evidence standard is a rigorous one, requiring evidence that is of extraordinary persuasiveness, and which makes the fact in issue highly probable.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “corresponding overt act demonstrating an intention to carry out the threats or other circumstances indicating that actual future violence is highly likely”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[m]ere verbal threats of violence are generally insufficient to establish danger to others.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.