Bingham v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
1953
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 1997
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Fisher v. Fiske · Jameson v. Harvel · Gardner v. Incorporated City of McAlester · Thomas v. Dawson · Kansas, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where a timely motion is filed by a nonresident defendant challenging the jurisdiction of the court and he subsequently answers for the purpose of defending the suit filed against him, and asks for no affirmative relief in his answer, his defending the suit is merely under protest and does not prejudice his protest of the lack of jurisdiction of the court.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“It is well settled law that a suit against two or more joint tortfeasors may be prosecuted in any county in which service may be had on any one of them and that the others may be joined;”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.