Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 264 Pa. Super. 136 - Commonwealth v. Stoner

264 Pa. Super. 136 - Commonwealth v. Stoner’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
August 1985
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Walton · 233 Pa. Super. 38 - Commonwealth v. Dunlap · Commonwealth v. Quarles · Commonwealth v. Dunlap · 237 Pa. Super. 424 - Commonwealth v. Flashburg

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]e, of course, continue to require the district attorneys of this Commonwealth to exercise their duties with complete impartiality. This record, however, absolutely fails to establish any indication to the contrary. Moreover, it would presently be unrealistic to require our district attorneys to abstain from the private practice of law, when the economics of the office in most counties all but demand an ancillary source of income. While a district attorney must certainly strive to avoid even the appearance of a conflict of interest between his official duties and his private affairs, in most counties, particularly smaller ones, he may have a civil practice far more extensive than his official obligations. Although the same standards of professional conduct must be maintained and applied to all, we would naturally expect the district attorneys of the smaller counties to be subject to more frequent challenge on the grounds of possible conflict. Nevertheless, we must emphasize that the same standards must be employed regardless of county size or extent of private practice in measuring the conflict question.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““1. The obtaining of property of another; 2. Subject to an agreement or known legal obligation upon the recipient to make specified payments or other disposition thereof; 3. Intentional dealing with the property obtained as the defendant’s own; and 4. Failure of the defendant to make the required disposition of the property.” Id., 240 Pa.Super. at 16 , 367 A.2d at 1094-95 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.