264 Pa. Super. 281 - Commonwealth v. Joines’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
October 1995
most recently cited
17 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Commonwealth v. Story · Commonwealth v. Katchmer · 247 Pa. Super. 99 - Commonwealth v. Kindness · Commonwealth v. Ross
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When a defendant is accepted into the program of accelerated rehabilitative disposition after information or indictment, the judge shall order that further proceedings on the charges shall be postponed during the term of the program.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]he jury should be allowed to evaluate whether the witness testified for the prosecution to gain favorable treatment in his own case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[N]ot only was the prosecutor able to promise [the witness] leniency, he provided him with leniency.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.