264 Pa. Super. 563 - Everson v. Everson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

19 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““The Uniform Enforcement of Judgments Act . . .provides that any foreign judgment of a court of the United States or of any other court requiring the payment of money shall be entitled to full faith and credit so long as the procedures for filing such judgment in Pennsylvania have been met. 12 P.S. 921, 922.[ 2 ] Since appellee complied .with the technical filing requirements of the Act the judgment is valid unless some particular overriding reason exists which would require us to deny full faith qnd credit to the judgment. Judgments transferred under the Act are to be given full faith and credit and the Act does not entitle a party to raise any and all defenses which destroy the full faith and credit obligation. Morris Lapidus Assoc. v. Airportels, Inc., 240 Pa. Superior Ct. 80 , 361 A. 2d 660 (1976). A lack of jurisdiction on the part of the court which originally awarded the judgment or a lack of due process on the part of that court are reasons why the principle of full faith and credit would be denied and the subsequent Pennsylvania judgment stricken.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Jimmy Rea Electronics, Inc. v. Maitilasso

2. “the concept of `community property' is repugnant to the law of Pennsylvania.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 444 So. 2d 774 - Mahmud v. Mahmud