Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 264 SO3D 537 - Cole v. Cole

Cole v. Cole’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 616 So. 2d 1234 - Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc. · Fink v. Bryant · 530 So. 2d 1151 - Pitre v. Opelousas General Hosp. · 637 So. 2d 127 - Montalvo v. Sondes · Overmier v. Traylor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he court on motion of a party ... may at any time and after a hearing order stricken from any pleading any insufficient demand or defense[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The granting of a motion to strike ... rests in the sound discretion of the trial court and is reviewed under the abuse of discretion standard.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[m]otions to strike are viewed with disfavor and are infrequently granted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.