Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 264 SW 283 - Moore v. Ivey

Moore v. Ivey’s Empirical Analysis

1924

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
7
states following
March 1977
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 1977

14 state decisions

40192419301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pecos & Northern Texas Railway Co. v. Cox · Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. Gray · Rush v. Atlanta Railway & Power Co. · Fox v. Houston & T. C. Ry. Co. · Ft. Worth, & D. C. Ry. Co. v. Smithers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The finding of the jury that the sponge was left in Mrs. Ivey in the Moore operation is not so against the weight and preponderance of the evidence as to require us to set the same aside.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.