Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 264 SW2D 673 - Wright v. Kinslow

Wright v. Kinslow’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
May 1980
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 1980

7 state decisions

301954196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cox's Administrator v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. · Star Furniture Co. v. Holland · Turpin v. Scrivner · Dorris v. Stevens' Administrator · Nickell v. Stewart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When all the occupants of an automobile are engaged in a ‘joint adventure’ or ‘joint enterprise,’ this Court has held that the negligence of one is the negligence of all, but in order to constitute a joint enterprise there must be an equal right, express or implied, among all occupants of the car, to direct and control its operation.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.