Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 264 SW3D 144 - Noland v. State

Noland v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 12th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Solem v. Helm · Patterson v. New York · Cunningham v. California · Cain v. State · Zuliani v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “At the punishment stage of a trial, the defendant may raise the issue as to whether he caused the death under the immediate influence of sudden passion arising from an adequate cause. If the defendant proves the issue in the affirmative by a preponderance of the evidence, the offense is a felony of the second degree.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.