Hall v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
September 2009
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Kelly v. State · Emerson v. State · Bagheri v. State · Hernandez v. State · 341 Ill. App. 3d 361 - People v. Canulli
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The [trial] court abused its discretion by denying Hall's pretrial suppression motion because the State failed to prove the reliability of the LIDAR technology on which the officer relied to determine Hall was speeding. Accordingly, we sustain Hall’s sole issue.”). . 824 S.W.2d 568 (Tex.Crim.App.1992). . See Steven Goode, Olin Guy Wellborn III & M. Michael Sharlot, 2 Texas Practice: Guide to the Rules of Evidence § 702.7 (3d ed. 2002), at 75 & n. 22 (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hall v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.