Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 264 SW3D 679 - Royalty v. Royalty

Royalty v. Royalty’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Murphy v. Carron · Marriage of Lynch v. Lynch · Brooks v. Brooks · Selby v. Selby · Eveland v. Eveland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the amount received was a small portion of the total judgment; (2) the amount accepted has effectively been conceded to be due by a [spouse] who did not appeal; (3) the acceptance of benefits was due to financial distress; (4) the absence of prejudice to the judgment debtor [spouse]; and (5) where the only issue on appeal is whether an award will be increased.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.