Ramos v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2011
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 337th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Moreno v. State · Narvaiz v. State · Hall v. State · Vernon v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““did then and there unlawfully, and with intent to defraud and harm another, forge a writing, namely a government instrument issued by the United States, attached hereto as Exhibit A, which purported to be the act of another who did not authorize that act, by possessing it with intent to utter it, and while knowing it was forged.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ramos v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.