Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 264 U.S. 484 - McCurdy v. United States

McCurdy v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

264 U.S. 484 · 1924

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
12
cited 12 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
January 2024
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions (12 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2024 · most notably United States v. Mason (1973), West v. Oklahoma Tax Commission (1948)

17 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

12019241930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedUnited States v. McCurdy (from Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Rickert · Gibson v. Chouteau · The Kansas Indians · Calumet Grain Elevator Company v. City of Chicago · Lykins v. McGrath

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * The doctrine of relation gives effect to an act done at one time as if it had been done at another. It is a legal fiction adopted by courts solely for purposes of justice — to avoid denial or loss of right, but not to impose burdens”,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The surplus lands shall be nontaxable for the period of three years from the approval of this act, except where certificates of competency are issued or in case of the death of the allottee, unless otherwise provided by Congress.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““All deeds . . . shall be executed by the principal chief for the ■ Osages, but no such deeds shall be valid until approved by the Secretary of the Interior.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.