Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 264 USAPPDC 1 - Hammon v. Barry

Hammon v. Barry’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
August 1987
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1971 (Civil Rights Act of 1957) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 707 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Washington v. Davis · Bolling v. Sharpe · Regents of the University of California v. Bakke · United Steelworkers of America v. Weber · Plessy v. Ferguson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(actually 37%) black representation in the Fire Department as compared with the 70% black composition of the District's workforce demonstrated discrimination. See Hammon, 813 F.2d at 441-42 (Mikva, J., dissenting); see also id. at 435. In his dissent to the denial of rehearing, however, Judge Mikva switches his statistics, claiming now that the 37% of blacks in the Fire Department, as compared to the 64.6% in the 1984 applicant pool, constitutes”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “I must confess, is beyond me, since in the same year 78.6% of the new hires were black--a hiring rate that exceeds the composition of blacks in the applicant pool. See Hammon, 813 F.2d at 418. In fact, Judge Mikva is mixing up what economists would describe as the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “by bringing suit include an individual's right to be free from discrimination by employers”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.