Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 264 Va. 358 - May v. Caruso

May v. Caruso’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

30 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Philip Morris, Inc. v. Emerson · John v. Wong Shik Im · McMunn v. Tatum · Harrison v. Commonwealth · Weinberg v. Given

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A trial court's exercise of its discretion in determining whether to admit or exclude evidence will not be overturned on appeal absent evidence that the trial court abused that discretion.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “whether a witness is qualified to testify as an expert is 'largely within the sound discretion of the trial court.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “permit[] the hearsay content of such articles to be read into the record as substantive evidence, provided no other evidentiary rule prohibits such admission.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.