Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 264 Va. 604 - Green v. Young

Green v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
2
states following
August 2010
most recently cited

36 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · United States v. Frady · Duncan v. State of Louisiana · Sullivan v. Louisiana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The question whether a prisoner is entitled to habeas relief is a mixed question of law and fact. Consequently, a circuit court's conclusions of law are not binding on this Court but are subject to review to ascertain whether the circuit court correctly applied the law to the facts.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.... [T]he question is whether there is a reasonable probability that, absent the errors, the factfinder would have had a reasonable doubt respecting guilt.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.