¶1—Motion to extend time to take appeal dismissed as untimely. Memorandum: Because the motion for an extension of time to take an appeal was made more than one year and 30 days from the dáte of sentencing, the motion is untimely (see, CPL 460.30 [1]). Defendant’s failing health does not excuse the failure to move within the statutory time period. Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Hurlbutt and Balio, JJ.
265 A.D.2d 941
People v. Smith
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 1, 1999
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1999-10-01
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently September 2003
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1999-10-01
View the full empirical analysis of this case →