Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 265 ALA 160 - King v. Kendrick

King v. Kendrick’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 1974
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Village of Euclid Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co · Leary v. Adams · Rosenberg v. City of Selma · Marchesi v. Selectmen of Winchester · Goldthwaite v. City Council

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In the case at bar it is sufficient to say that the regulation here was in force and effect prior to the issuance by the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board of the permit to the appellant and the opening and operation of his business on the premises in question. Under Title 62, § 330(239a), Pocket Part, Code of 1940, authority is given the building commissioner for the enforcement of county zoning regulations by means of the withholding of building, use or occupancy permits. In refusing the appellant a use permit to sell beer, the building commissioner was acting within the valid and lawful exercise of his power.” (265 Ala. at 164, 90 So.2d at 91 )”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.