Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 265 ALA 168 - Hunter v. Parkman

Hunter v. Parkman’s Empirical Analysis

1956

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2004
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brigham & Co. v. Carlisle · Hunter v. Parkman · Hunter v. Parkman · Hunter v. Parkman · Tanner v. Foley Bldg. & Mfg. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the rule [is] that in the event of the destruction or interruption of an established business, loss of profits may be recovered if the amount of actual loss is rendered reasonably certain by competent proof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.