Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 265 ALA 236 - Smith v. Rice

Smith v. Rice’s Empirical Analysis

1956

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 2017

10 state decisions

401956196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fiscus v. Young · Griffin v. Milligan · Smith v. Chism

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"From the record before us it seems clear that the decree appealed from was not rendered in an ex parte proceeding. On the contrary, both appellant and appellee filed pleadings and amendments thereto, both of said parties were represented by counsel , and both called, examined and cross-examined witnesses. There is every indication that the parties considered themselves engaged in an adversary proceeding. . . ." (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.