Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 265 Ala. 398 - Hurst v. Thomas

Hurst v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

1956

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
3
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 2015

14 state decisions

601956196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Heflin v. Milton · Spencer v. Spencer · Allen v. Bromberg · Jackson v. Allen · Brightman v. Hicks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Every contract for the sale of lands, tenements or hereditaments, or of any interest therein, except leases for a term not longer than one year, unless the purchase money, or a portion thereof be paid, and the purchaser be put in possession of the land by the seller.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “an executory agreement which is void under the statute of frauds cannot be made effectual by estoppel merely because it has been acted on by the promisee, and has not been performed by the promisor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.